Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Manual solutions also known as Turing tests.
    These kind of tests include:
    • 1 : logic puzzles
      We completly agree with Matt May on this point. We also consider that designing logic puzzle that are not cultural or language
      dependant is only possible throught mathematical puzzles. But on this particular field, calculation, robots have already proved their superiority...
      Plus, generating automatically a large number of independant logical tests does not seem feasable. This is why we classified this solution as manual. belou, je pense que cette partie est à revoir. Le fait de ne pas avoir aujourd'hui la solution pour automatiser les tests logique ne suffit pas pour classer la logique en tant que solution non automatisable, tu ne penses pas?
      Je suis d'accord mon pti canard.En fait j'irai même plus loin au risque de passer pour un vieil intello:Le jour ou on saura générer automatiquement des tests cognitifs pour toute l'humanité, je crois que la machine sera largement assez intelligente pour passer un test de Turing.Ceci dit je n'ai aucun élément pour étayer mon propos, la simple béquille de mon intuition.
    • 5: Limited-use accounts
      This is the manual version of the heuristic checks.
    • 4 : live operator, by phone or chat
      This is the best option : real Turing tests. The only limiting factor is economic : providing operator for all requests without delay is surely a very expensive solution.

So what ?

  • About security
    • a system security level is less or equal the lower security level of its sub components, so implementing a solution system (visual and sound captcha) would be as vulnarable as the worse most vulnarable solution.
    • Being able to easily change the tests is crucial see proof of concept
  • Automatic :
    Coupling sensorial tests (speech or image recognition) with trivial logic puzzle
  • Central humanity system?
  • The blade runner game
    As we have already mentionned, building complex cognitive puzzle automaticaly is too complicated.
    We also see that bots are almost as good as human on sensorial tests (specialy on sounds based tests).
    We think that coupling sensorial tests and trivial logic puzzle is a simple way to add complexity and thus to trasnform a nearly trivial AI problem (sensorial only test) to a Complex AI problem.
    See this brillant article : Proposal for an Accessible Captcha